<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>No Fluff News &#187; Congress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nofluffnews.org/category/united-states/congress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nofluffnews.org</link>
	<description>Slicing Through the Non-News of the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 02:32:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Congress needs their Comfort Despite Air Force Reccomendations</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/10/congress-needs-their-comfort-despite-air-force-reccomendations/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/10/congress-needs-their-comfort-despite-air-force-reccomendations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NWO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Congress plans to spend $550 million to buy eight jets, a substantial upgrade to the fleet used by federal officials at a time when lawmakers have criticized the use of corporate jets by companies receiving taxpayer funds&#8230;&#8230;The congressional shopping list goes beyond what the Air Force had initially requested as part of its annual appropriations. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/99/Gulfstream_V_NASA.jpg" title="Gulfstream V" height="180" />&#8220;Congress plans to spend $550 million to buy eight jets, a substantial upgrade to the fleet used by federal officials at a time when lawmakers have criticized the use of corporate jets by companies receiving taxpayer funds&#8230;<br/><br/>&#8230;The congressional shopping list goes beyond what the Air Force had initially requested as part of its annual appropriations. The Pentagon sought to buy one Gulfstream V and one business-class equivalent of a Boeing 737 to replace aging planes. The Defense Department also asked to buy two additional 737s that were being leased.<br/><br/>Lawmakers in the House last week added funds to buy those planes, and plus funds to buy an additional two 737s and two Gulfstream V planes. The purchases must still be approved by the Senate. The Air Force version of the Gulfstream V each costs $66 million, according to the Department of Defense, and the 737s cost about $70 million.<br/><br/>Geoff Morrell, the Pentagon press secretary, said the Department of Defense didn&#8217;t request the additional planes and doesn&#8217;t need them. &#8216;We ask for what we need and only what we need,&#8217; he told reporters Wednesday. &#8216;We&#8217;ve always frowned upon earmarks and additives that are above and beyond what we ask for.&#8217;&#8221;<br/><br/><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124960404730212955.html" target="_blank">source: wsj.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/10/congress-needs-their-comfort-despite-air-force-reccomendations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
