<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>No Fluff News &#187; big brother</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nofluffnews.org/tag/big-brother/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nofluffnews.org</link>
	<description>Slicing Through the Non-News of the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 02:32:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A Must See for Everyone&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/24/a-must-see-for-everyone/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/24/a-must-see-for-everyone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banksters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geithner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humanity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Industrial Complex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NWO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eugenics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Currency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[source: The Alex Jones Channel on Youtube.com
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3u5Nd9i1UiA&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3u5Nd9i1UiA&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object><br/><br/><a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/3u5Nd9i1UiA" target="_blank">source: The Alex Jones Channel on Youtube.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/24/a-must-see-for-everyone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beware of the Propaganda Concerning Town Hall Protests and the Divisiveness of Left, Right Politics</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/10/beware-of-the-propaganda-concerning-town-hall-protests-and-the-divisiveness-of-left-right-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/10/beware-of-the-propaganda-concerning-town-hall-protests-and-the-divisiveness-of-left-right-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 02:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NWO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Left-Right Paradigm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The media created myth that the town hall protests raging across the country are artificially manufactured is starting to crack, as the public takes the press to task for parroting the erroneous talking point that the demonstrations are the work of lobbyists and Republican organizations, and that they are fostered by underlying racism.A caller to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/august2009/100809top.jpg" title="Manufactured Protests Myth Starts To Crack " height="180" />&#8220;The media created myth that the town hall protests raging across the country are artificially manufactured is starting to crack, as the public takes the press to task for parroting the erroneous talking point that the demonstrations are the work of lobbyists and Republican organizations, and that they are fostered by underlying racism.<br/><br/>A caller to C-Span’s Washington Journal show perfectly clarified the issues we have been highlighting all along, that the protesters are not just Republican &#8216;right-wingers,&#8217; they aren’t being prodded into action by lobbyists, and the anger is not just directed against Obamacare, but against the entire agenda, and especially against Congress passing legislation thousands of pages long without even reading it.<br/><br/>As we highlighted last week, ABC News reported that there was no evidence of lobbyists at the protests. Shortly after this, Obamanoids simply switched their talking point and started to claim that the demonstrations were all being organized by Republican organizations.<br/><br/>The C-Span caller who labeled herself an Independent stated that she only started going to protests as recently as July 4th and before that she wasn’t even political. The caller points out that the protests are growing because, &#8216;All these massive bills, thousands of pages long that are passed with almost no debate, no time for us to see what’s in it,&#8217; and in complete contrast to promised of transparency on behalf of the new administration&#8230;&#8221;<br/><br/><a href="http://www.infowars.com/manufactured-protests-myth-starts-to-crack/" target="_blank">source: infowars.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/10/beware-of-the-propaganda-concerning-town-hall-protests-and-the-divisiveness-of-left-right-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>and now for something to Clarify the Murkiness of Media &#8211; Danny Deconstructs the Mainstream Media</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/10/and-now-for-something-to-clarify-the-murkiness-of-media/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/10/and-now-for-something-to-clarify-the-murkiness-of-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cveitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[source cvietch on youtube
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qxTT51hO7Wg&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qxTT51hO7Wg&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object><br/><br/><a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/qxTT51hO7Wg" target="_blank">source cvietch on youtube</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/10/and-now-for-something-to-clarify-the-murkiness-of-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress needs their Comfort Despite Air Force Reccomendations</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/10/congress-needs-their-comfort-despite-air-force-reccomendations/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/10/congress-needs-their-comfort-despite-air-force-reccomendations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NWO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Congress plans to spend $550 million to buy eight jets, a substantial upgrade to the fleet used by federal officials at a time when lawmakers have criticized the use of corporate jets by companies receiving taxpayer funds&#8230;&#8230;The congressional shopping list goes beyond what the Air Force had initially requested as part of its annual appropriations. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/99/Gulfstream_V_NASA.jpg" title="Gulfstream V" height="180" />&#8220;Congress plans to spend $550 million to buy eight jets, a substantial upgrade to the fleet used by federal officials at a time when lawmakers have criticized the use of corporate jets by companies receiving taxpayer funds&#8230;<br/><br/>&#8230;The congressional shopping list goes beyond what the Air Force had initially requested as part of its annual appropriations. The Pentagon sought to buy one Gulfstream V and one business-class equivalent of a Boeing 737 to replace aging planes. The Defense Department also asked to buy two additional 737s that were being leased.<br/><br/>Lawmakers in the House last week added funds to buy those planes, and plus funds to buy an additional two 737s and two Gulfstream V planes. The purchases must still be approved by the Senate. The Air Force version of the Gulfstream V each costs $66 million, according to the Department of Defense, and the 737s cost about $70 million.<br/><br/>Geoff Morrell, the Pentagon press secretary, said the Department of Defense didn&#8217;t request the additional planes and doesn&#8217;t need them. &#8216;We ask for what we need and only what we need,&#8217; he told reporters Wednesday. &#8216;We&#8217;ve always frowned upon earmarks and additives that are above and beyond what we ask for.&#8217;&#8221;<br/><br/><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124960404730212955.html" target="_blank">source: wsj.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/10/congress-needs-their-comfort-despite-air-force-reccomendations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Venezuelan Government Closing down 34 &#8220;Bourgeoisie&#8221; Radio Stations</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/02/venezuelan-government-closing-down-34-bourgeoisie-radio-stations/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/02/venezuelan-government-closing-down-34-bourgeoisie-radio-stations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 03:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugo Chavez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;he Venezuelan government has ordered the closure of 34 radio stations, the head of the national telecommunications regulator, Conatel, has said. Diosdado Cabello, who is also minister of public works in the government of Hugo Chavez,  the Venezuelan president, said the closures were due to the stations&#8217; inability to meet legal operating requirements, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a8/HugoChavez1823.jpeg/800px-HugoChavez1823.jpeg" title="hugo chavez brazil" height="180" />&#8220;he Venezuelan government has ordered the closure of 34 radio stations, the head of the national telecommunications regulator, Conatel, has said. Diosdado Cabello, who is also minister of public works in the government of Hugo Chavez,  the Venezuelan president, said the closures were due to the stations&#8217; inability to meet legal operating requirements, and warned that more closures may follow.<br/><br/>&#8216;They will have to cease transmission once they have received the order&#8217;, Cabello said on Friday. &#8216;This is about legitimate authority of the government to manage the radio spectrum&#8230; We are only implementing what the law says&#8230;&#8217;&#8221;<br/><br/><a href="http://english.aljazeera.net/news/americas/2009/08/20098133741167236.html" target="_blank">source: aljazeera.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/02/venezuelan-government-closing-down-34-bourgeoisie-radio-stations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK Plans to Install CCTVs in 20,000 Brit&#8217;s Homes, for the Children&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/02/uk-plans-to-install-cctvs-in-20000-brits-homes-for-the-children/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/02/uk-plans-to-install-cctvs-in-20000-brits-homes-for-the-children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 02:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NWO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;THOUSANDS of the worst families in England are to be put in “sin bins” in a bid to change their bad behaviour, Ed Balls announced yesterday. The Children’s Secretary set out £400million plans to put 20,000 problem families under 24-hour CCTV super-vision in their own homes. They will be monitored to ensure that children attend [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/06/OxfordCCTV2006.jpg/800px-OxfordCCTV2006.jpg" title="CCTV Oxford" height="180" />&#8220;THOUSANDS of the worst families in England are to be put in “sin bins” in a bid to change their bad behaviour, Ed Balls announced yesterday. The Children’s Secretary set out £400million plans to put 20,000 problem families under 24-hour CCTV super-vision in their own homes. They will be monitored to ensure that children attend school, go to bed on time and eat proper meals.<br/><br/>Private security guards will also be sent round to carry out home checks, while parents will be given help to combat drug and alcohol addiction. Around 2,000 families have gone through these Family Intervention Projects so far. But ministers want to target 20,000 more in the next two years, with each costing between £5,000 and £20,000 – a potential total bill of £400million. Ministers hope the move will reduce the number of youngsters who get drawn into crime because of their chaotic family lives, as portrayed in Channel 4 comedy drama Shameless. Sin bin projects operate in half of council areas already but Mr Balls wants every local authority to fund them&#8230;&#8221;<br/><br/><a href="http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/115736/Sin-bins-for-worst-families" target="_blank">source: express.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/02/uk-plans-to-install-cctvs-in-20000-brits-homes-for-the-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Napolitano Continues Bush&#8217;s Federalization of Local and State Law Enforcement</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/02/napolitano-continues-bushs-federalization-of-local-and-state-law-enforcement/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/02/napolitano-continues-bushs-federalization-of-local-and-state-law-enforcement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 01:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G W Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Napolitano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NWO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano traveled to New York to deliver a speech to the boss today. She told the Council on Foreign Relations there will be no departure from the Bush administration in regard to homeland security. It will be the same agenda with a few minor changes — for instance, the color-coded threat [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/02/Portrait_Napolitano_hires.jpg/800px-Portrait_Napolitano_hires.jpg" title="janet napolitano fatigues" height="180" />&#8220;Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano traveled to New York to deliver a speech to the boss today. She told the Council on Foreign Relations there will be no departure from the Bush administration in regard to homeland security. It will be the same agenda with a few minor changes — for instance, the color-coded threat advisory will be chucked.<br/><br/>&#8216;Napolitano sang the praises of counter-terrorism intelligence being shared between federal, state and local agencies through arrangements known as fusion centers,&#8217; writes Frank James for NPR. Napolitano said she plans &#8216;to make them a top priority for this department to support them, build them, improve them and work with them.&#8217;<br/><br/>Translation: the feds will continue the full-steam ahead effort to federalize state and local law enforcement, an effort that began in earnest under Bill Clinton and picked up critical momentum during the reign of George W. Bush. &#8216;Napolitano sounded just like her predecessors Ridge and Michael Chertoff,&#8217; James continues. &#8216;And she talked about educating the populace about how to be the eyes and ears of counter-terrorism and also how to respond to the aftermath of man-made or natural disasters,&#8217; or for that matter government contrived false flag operations. Napolitano told the internationalist cabal in New York that the American people suffer from &#8216;complacency&#8217; and this is a &#8216;threat in the United States.&#8217; In order to combat complacency, the government has to do more to &#8216;educate&#8217; the public on the threat posed by terrorists and other miscreants. In other words, Napolitano admitted the incessant warnings of impending doom — from dirty bombs in major cities to bad guys taking out nuclear plants — have not worked&#8230;&#8221;<br/><br/><a href="http://www.infowars.com/napolitano-reports-to-cfr-on-stasi-snoop-network/" target="_blank">source: infowars.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/02/napolitano-continues-bushs-federalization-of-local-and-state-law-enforcement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Protect Yourself from Big Brother on the Internet</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/02/how-to-protect-yourself-from-big-brother-on-the-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/02/how-to-protect-yourself-from-big-brother-on-the-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 00:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic frontier foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;&#8230;The Internet remains one of the most powerful means ever created to give voice to repressed people around the world. Unfortunately, new technologies have also given authoritarian regimes new means to identify and retaliate against those who speak out despite censorship and surveillance. Below are six basic ideas for those attempting to speak without falling
victim [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8e/All_seeing_eye.jpg/800px-All_seeing_eye.jpg" title="" height="180" />&#8220;&#8230;The Internet remains one of the most powerful means ever created to give voice to repressed people around the world. Unfortunately, new technologies have also given authoritarian regimes new means to identify and retaliate against those who speak out despite censorship and surveillance. Below are six basic ideas for those attempting to speak without falling<br />
victim to authoritarian surveillance and censorship, and four ideas for the rest of us who want to help support them&#8230;<br/><br/>1. Understand Risk Assessment<br/>2. Beware of Malware<br/>3. Choose the Least-Risky Communications Channels<br/>4. Use Encryption to Prevent Surveillance and Censorship of your Web Usage<br/>5. Be Careful of What and Where You Publish<br/>6. Should I use a Tor Bridge&#8230;&#8221;<br/><br/><a href="http://www.eff.org/files/eff-surveillance-self-defense.pdf" target="_blank">source: eff.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/02/how-to-protect-yourself-from-big-brother-on-the-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motorhome Diaries Denied Entry into Canada</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/02/motorhome-diaries-denied-entry-into-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/02/motorhome-diaries-denied-entry-into-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 00:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Borders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[source: youtube.com
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/po9823lzJ44&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/po9823lzJ44&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object><br/><br/><a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/po9823lzJ44" target="_blank">source: youtube.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/08/02/motorhome-diaries-denied-entry-into-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Vulnerabilities of State Imposed Smart Grids</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/30/the-vulnerabilities-of-state-imposed-smart-grids/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/30/the-vulnerabilities-of-state-imposed-smart-grids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The city of Miami and several commercial partners plan to rollout a “smart grid” citywide electrical infrastructure by the year 2011. This rollout was
announced on the heels of news that foreign agents have infiltrated our existing electrical infrastructure and that recent penetration tests have uncovered numerous vulnerabilities in the proposed technologies. Simultaneously, the National Institute [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/12/Elster_A3_Alpha_Type_A30_electricity_meter_collector.jpeg/450px-Elster_A3_Alpha_Type_A30_electricity_meter_collector.jpeg" title="electricity meter collector" height="180" />&#8220;The city of Miami and several commercial partners plan to rollout a “smart grid” citywide electrical infrastructure by the year 2011. This rollout was<br />
announced on the heels of news that foreign agents have infiltrated our existing electrical infrastructure and that recent penetration tests have uncovered numerous vulnerabilities in the proposed technologies. Simultaneously, the National Institute for Standards in Technology (“NIST”) has recently released a roadmap for producing smart grid standards. In this whitepaper, I will discuss the flaws with the current guidelines and map them to the criticisms of similar regulatory mandates, including the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (“PCI DSS”), that rely heavily on organizations policing themselves&#8230;<br/><br/>As of the writing of this white paper, NIST has released a draft framework for review that includes some of the proposed standards. While there are several security standards listed in the framework, NIST appears to be making the same mistakes of previous regulatory mandate governing bodies. For example, the PCI DSS standards have been criticized for not requiring a high-level of security in environments that process cardholder data. Specifically, one of the major criticisms is the “self policing” aspect of these standards. The credit card companies (American Express, Discover<br />
Financial Services, JCB International, MasterCard Worldwide, and Visa Inc.) are responsible for ensuring that relevant companies are compliant with the standards. If a company is deemed non-compliant, then the credit card companies issue what they consider to be the appropriate punishment&#8230;&#8221;<br/><br/><a href="http://www.blackhat.com/presentations/bh-usa-09/FLICK/BHUSA09-Flick-HackingSmartGrid-PAPER.pdf" target="_blank">source: blackhat.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/30/the-vulnerabilities-of-state-imposed-smart-grids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bernanke is Nervous, Poor Guy</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/30/bernanke-is-nervous-poor-guy/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/30/bernanke-is-nervous-poor-guy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banksters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke appeared incredibly nervous during an interview aired last night on PBS’ NewsHour, particularly during a question on the ongoing effort to pass legislation that would see the Fed’s books being opened up to a general audit. In a display that will greatly encourage those who continue for push for greater [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.infowars.net/pictures/july2009/290709Bernanke.jpg" title="bernanke, on the record" height="180" />&#8220;Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke appeared incredibly nervous during an interview aired last night on PBS’ NewsHour, particularly during a question on the ongoing effort to pass legislation that would see the Fed’s books being opened up to a general audit. In a display that will greatly encourage those who continue for push for greater transparency of the privately run Fed’s actions, Bernanke stammered and stuttered his way through the interview, his voice shaking as he attempted to rail against calls to audit the Fed, reciting now familiar and standard lines of propaganda.<br/><br/>&#8216;There’s an effort in Congress, and in the House in particular, to audit what the Federal Reserve does, particularly in monetary policy. How do you feel about that?&#8217; asked PBS’ Jim Lehrer. &#8216;So that bill, people don’t fully understand what that bill is about. It sounds like, audit the Fed, it sounds like ‘Let’s look at the books.’ That’s what it sounds like.&#8217; Bernanke spluttered&#8230;&#8221;<br/><br/><a href="http://www.infowars.com/bernanke-stutters-stammers-and-shakes-his-way-through-questions-on-audit-the-fed-bill/" target="_blank">source: infowars.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/30/bernanke-is-nervous-poor-guy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DHS Infectious Pathogen Facility in Tornado Alley</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/28/dhs-infectious-pathogen-facility-in-tornado-alley/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/28/dhs-infectious-pathogen-facility-in-tornado-alley/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 01:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NWO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pathogen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathogen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Department of Homeland Security relied on a rushed, flawed study to justify its decision to locate a $700 million research facility for highly infectious pathogens in a tornado-prone section of Kansas, according to a government report.The department&#8217;s analysis was not &#8220;scientifically defensible&#8221; in concluding that it could safely handle dangerous animal diseases in Kansas [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/97/Influenza_a.jpg/800px-Influenza_a.jpg" title="h1n1 influenza" height="180" />&#8220;The Department of Homeland Security relied on a rushed, flawed study to justify its decision to locate a $700 million research facility for highly infectious pathogens in a tornado-prone section of Kansas, according to a government report.<br/><br/>The department&#8217;s analysis was not &#8220;scientifically defensible&#8221; in concluding that it could safely handle dangerous animal diseases in Kansas &#8212; or any other location on the U.S. mainland, according to a Government Accountability Office draft report obtained by The Washington Post. The GAO said DHS greatly underestimated the chance of accidental release and major contamination from such research, which has been conducted only on a remote island off the United States.<br/><br/>DHS staff members tried quietly last week to fend off a public airing of the facility&#8217;s risks, agency correspondence shows. Department officials met privately with staff members of a congressional oversight subcommittee to try to convince them that the GAO report was unfair, and to urge them to forgo or postpone a hearing. But the House Energy and Commerce Committee&#8217;s oversight and investigations subcommittee, chaired by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), decided otherwise. It plans to hold a hearing Thursday on the risk analysis, according to two sources briefed on the plans. &#8220;<br/><br/><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/26/AR2009072602857.html" target="_blank">source: washingtonpost.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/28/dhs-infectious-pathogen-facility-in-tornado-alley/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swine Flu Hype: London Readies Catacombs as Mass Graves</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/27/swine-flu-hype-london-readies-catacombs-as-mass-graves/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/27/swine-flu-hype-london-readies-catacombs-as-mass-graves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NWO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swine Flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaccine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eugenics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influenza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scare tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A city council said Saturday it was considering using underground burial chambers, currently a tourist attraction, to store the corpses of swine flu victims if the pandemic worsens.Exeter City Council said the empty 19th-century catacombs could become an emergency mortuary.A council spokesman said the plan could be put into operation if the cemeteries and the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/47/Catacombs_highgate_west_cemetery.jpg" title="" height="180" />&#8220;A city council said Saturday it was considering using underground burial chambers, currently a tourist attraction, to store the corpses of swine flu victims if the pandemic worsens.<br/><br/>Exeter City Council said the empty 19th-century catacombs could become an emergency mortuary.<br/><br/>A council spokesman said the plan could be put into operation if the cemeteries and the crematorium could not keep up with funeral demands.<br/><br/>He said: &#8216;We have some empty catacombs in an old cemetery in the city. These are 19th century underground burial chambers which are normally a tourist attraction,&#8217; he said.<br/><br/>&#8216;They can, however, be safely used for their original purpose and allow us to temporarily store bodies in the remote possibility that the need should arise&#8230;&#8217;&#8221;<br/><br/><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5heqsANHKKoso7hrqpXcs0CePDHhA" target="_blank">source: AFP</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/27/swine-flu-hype-london-readies-catacombs-as-mass-graves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Israel&#8217;s Guise of Freedom</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/27/israels-guise-of-freedom/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/27/israels-guise-of-freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Israel is a democracy, we are told. We have freedom of speech to prove it. Aside from a few pesky details of a permanent state of emergency which allows the government and security forces to impose censorship of the media, we really are free to speak our minds – to an extent.The legal limits on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a0/Israeli_military_police_women_stand_in_formation_during_an_honor_cordon_ceremony_for_Secretary_of_Defense_Robert_M._Gates_in_Tel_Aviv.JPEG/762px-Israeli_military_police_women_stand_in_formation_during_an_honor_cordon_ceremony_for_Secretary_of_Defense_Robert_M._Gates_in_Tel_Aviv.JPEG" title="Israeli Women Military" height="180" />&#8220;Israel is a democracy, we are told. We have freedom of speech to prove it. Aside from a few pesky details of a permanent state of emergency which allows the government and security forces to impose censorship of the media, we really are free to speak our minds – to an extent.<br/><br/>The legal limits on personal expression are draconian, but not very often invoked. It is the unspoken limits of freedom of speech which are more binding. Even as I write I hear the clinking of the chains in my mind: how much do I dare expose? What might be the repercussions of this word, or that sentence?<br/><br/>I, like most young Israeli Jews, went to the army at the age of 18. At the time I barely even questioned this. Going to the army here is a fact of life, merely another step in the standard &#8216;natural&#8217; order: six years of grade school, six of high school, three in the army and so forth. In the army I was exposed to matters of varying levels of secrecy. Divulging them is, of course, illegal. But even that is not what I feel constrains me and so many others. What security clearance deems secret is not, as a general rule, an interesting subject for conversation other than in very specific circumstances, almost never occurring outside the army.&#8221;<br/><br/><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/libertycentral/2009/jul/26/israel-freedom-speech-censorship" target="_blank">source: guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/27/israels-guise-of-freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US 5th Army Division Suburbans Being Transported on I-35 in Texas</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/27/us-5th-army-division-suburbans-being-transported-on-i-35-in-texas/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/27/us-5th-army-division-suburbans-being-transported-on-i-35-in-texas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fifth Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NWO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLE 09]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Comm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;On June 27, 2009, Will Bratton posted the videos below on the Vimeo website. It shows a flatbed trailer ferrying a couple black SUV Suburbans with Defense logos on them (described as Fifth Army, HHC CSRD). The video was shot on I-35 between San Marcos and Austin, Texas. &#8216;I did a tour in Iraq, 05-06, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;On June 27, 2009, Will Bratton posted the videos below on the Vimeo website. It shows a flatbed trailer ferrying a couple black SUV Suburbans with Defense logos on them (described as Fifth Army, HHC CSRD). The video was shot on I-35 between San Marcos and Austin, Texas. &#8216;I did a tour in Iraq, 05-06, and I don’t remember any civilian models this heavily equipped being there,&#8217; writes Bratton.<br/><br/>The transport of these heavily equipped vehicles occurred a month before NLE 09, the FEMA exercise that kicks off this week. Is it possible these vehicles are related to the exercise aimed at confronting “domestic terrorists,” defined by the DHS as &#8216;rightwing extremists&#8217;?&#8221;<br/><br/><object width="400" height="270"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5369129&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5369129&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="400" height="270"></embed></object>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/5369129">US Army North, Fifth Army, HHC TMP in San Marcos, TX</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user1761471">Will Bratton</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
<p><object width="400" height="270"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5369383&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5369383&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="400" height="270"></embed></object>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/5369383">US Army North, Fifth Army, HHC CSRD in San Marcos, TX</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user1761471">Will Bratton</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.infowars.com/u-s-army-vehicles-spotted-on-i-35-in-texas/" target="_blank">source: infowars.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/27/us-5th-army-division-suburbans-being-transported-on-i-35-in-texas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Down Under, Internet Filtering Trial Declared a Success</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/27/down-under-internet-filtering-trial-declared-a-success/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/27/down-under-internet-filtering-trial-declared-a-success/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filtering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Although not without controversy, the initial testing of the Australian government&#8217;s Internet filtering system has gone off fairly well, according to reports from some of the participating ISPs. Five of the nine ISPs testing the government&#8217;s filtering system reported few problems during testing, even though only 15 customers participated at one and a couple of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ed/Australia_satellite_plane.jpg/729px-Australia_satellite_plane.jpg" title="Australia satellite" height="180" />&#8220;Although not without controversy, the initial testing of the Australian government&#8217;s Internet filtering system has gone off fairly well, according to reports from some of the participating ISPs. Five of the nine ISPs testing the government&#8217;s filtering system reported few problems during testing, even though only 15 customers participated at one and a couple of customers at another were unable to access a completely legal porn site. The other four IPs have either yet to comment on the filter&#8217;s performance or have refused to talk publicly about the results.<br/><br/>Australia&#8217;s government first announced its intention to add a Great Barrier Reef of sorts around the nation&#8217;s virtual shores nearly two years ago, in August 2007. Initial testing began in the island state of Tasmania in February 2008, with cost estimates running as high as AUS$189 million (about US$154 million). The filters were originally intended to be on by default, with consumers able to opt out.<br/><br/>Much to the dismay of the program&#8217;s critics, things changed last October. As details about the country&#8217;s Cyber-Safety Plan emerged, we learned that all &#8216;illegal&#8217; content would be blocked for everyone, with no possibility for individuals to opt out. The main government-supplied blacklist would be applied universally, while an &#8220;additional material&#8221; blacklist targeting age-appropriate content would be optional for users.&#8221;<br/><br/><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/07/aussie-net-filtering-trial-deemed-a-success-despite-problems.ars" target="_blank">source: arstechnica.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/27/down-under-internet-filtering-trial-declared-a-success/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ma Bell Becomes Big Brother by Blocking 4chan</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/27/ma-bell-becomes-big-brother-by-blocking-4chan/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/27/ma-bell-becomes-big-brother-by-blocking-4chan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;As if AT&#038;T wasn’t already bad enough. In an act that is sure to spark internet rebellions everywhere, AT&#038;T has apparently declared war on the extremely popular imageboard 4chan.org, blocking some of the site’s most popular message boards, including /r9k/ and the infamous /b/. moot, who started 4chan and continues to run the site, has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/89/AT%26T_Center_satellite_view.png/800px-AT%26T_Center_satellite_view.png" title="at&#038;t" height="180" />&#8220;As if AT&#038;T wasn’t already bad enough. In an act that is sure to spark internet rebellions everywhere, AT&#038;T has apparently declared war on the extremely popular imageboard 4chan.org, blocking some of the site’s most popular message boards, including /r9k/ and the infamous /b/. moot, who started 4chan and continues to run the site, has posted a note to the 4chan status blog indicating that AT&#038;T is in fact filtering/blocking the site for many of its customers (we’re still trying to confirm from AT&#038;T’s side).<br/><br/>Reports of the blocking began to surface on reddit this afternoon, and a number of blogs are beginning to pick up on the story, though it doesn’t seem like any have managed to get a comment from AT&#038;T (we’ve reached out to the company and will update once we hear back)&#8230; &#8220;<br/><br/><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/26/att-blocks-4chan-this-is-going-to-get-ugly/" target="_blank">source: techcrunch.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/27/ma-bell-becomes-big-brother-by-blocking-4chan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK Targets Savage to Balance Ban List</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/26/uk-targets-savage-to-balance-ban-list/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/26/uk-targets-savage-to-balance-ban-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael savage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Official correspondence, released under the United Kingdom&#8217;s Freedom of Information law, reveals that U.S. radio talk-show host Michael Savage&#8217;s name was placed on a list of people banned from Britain in order to provide &#8220;balance&#8221; to a &#8220;least wanted&#8221; list dominated by Muslim extremists, and the decision was made &#8220;at the highest level of government,&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://www.wnd.com/images/0722savage.jpg" title="michael savage" height="180" />&#8220;Official correspondence, released under the United Kingdom&#8217;s Freedom of Information law, reveals that U.S. radio talk-show host Michael Savage&#8217;s name was placed on a list of people banned from Britain in order to provide &#8220;balance&#8221; to a &#8220;least wanted&#8221; list dominated by Muslim extremists, and the decision was made &#8220;at the highest level of government,&#8221; the London Daily Mail reported today.<br/><br/>&#8216;We will want to ensure that the names disclosed reflect the broad range of cases and are not all Islamic extremists,&#8217; reads a draft recommendation, marked &#8216;Restricted,&#8217; that was obtained as part of Savage&#8217;s libel lawsuit against the government and former Home Secretary Jacqui Smith. &#8220;<br/><br/><a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&#038;pageId=105029" target="_blank">source: wnd.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/26/uk-targets-savage-to-balance-ban-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arguing Against Torture</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/26/arguing-against-torture/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/26/arguing-against-torture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Toture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A signatory to the UN Convention Against Torture, the United States &#8216;does not torture.&#8217; Yet abundant evidence indicates that it does, directly or by proxy—and in fact always has. An old American tradition of state-sponsored torture even has its own lexicon: SOA, Kubark, Phoenix, MK-Ultra, rendition, CIA&#8217;s &#8216;no-touch&#8217; paradigm, etc. It is quite popular, too. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4e/TortureWaterboarding.jpg/800px-TortureWaterboarding.jpg" title="waterboarding" height="180" />&#8220;A signatory to the UN Convention Against Torture, the United States &#8216;does not torture.&#8217; Yet abundant evidence indicates that it does, directly or by proxy—and in fact always has. An old American tradition of state-sponsored torture even has its own lexicon: SOA, Kubark, Phoenix, MK-Ultra, rendition, CIA&#8217;s &#8216;no-touch&#8217; paradigm, etc. It is quite popular, too. Torture enjoys more than twice the public support in the US that it does in France, Spain, and the UK. One of the most watched TV dramas, 24, is but an extended ode to the glories of torture. The former director of a prominent human rights center at Harvard writes of the judicious use of sleep deprivation, hooding, and targeted assassinations; he concedes the government&#8217;s need to &#8216;traffic in evils.&#8217; The nation&#8217;s most celebrated defense attorney recommends &#8216;torture warrants&#8217; and &#8216;the sterilized needle being shoved under the fingernails&#8217; (&#8217;sterilized&#8217; because he is a liberal). The most cited legal scholar in the land writes: &#8216;If the stakes are high enough, torture is permissible. No one who doubts that this is the case should be in a position of responsibility.&#8217;<br/><br/>Anti-torture voices have been left sounding defensive, insecure, incoherent. Yet, while boasting the world&#8217;s highest incarceration numbers and supermax prisons characterized by a warden as a &#8220;clean version of hell,&#8221; the US has also begun to question its tolerance of torture. The debate is on, and torture is winning. I intend here to lay the foundation for a strong, cogent anti-torture position. It rests upon three principles:<br/><br/>Torture is always wrong;<br/>Torture must be banned by law unconditionally;<br/>Not all torture decisions should be morally codified.<br/><br/>The first two principles reject torture on moral grounds (it&#8217;s wrong) and legal ones (it&#8217;s bad)&#8230;&#8221;<br/><br/><a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/chazelle07222009.html" target="_blank">via counterpunch.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/26/arguing-against-torture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOE Security has Developed a Virtual Neighborhood Watch to Protect its Interests</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/22/doe-security-has-developed-a-virtual-neighborhood-watch-to-protect-its-interests/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/22/doe-security-has-developed-a-virtual-neighborhood-watch-to-protect-its-interests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Scientists at DOE&#8217;s Argonne National Laboratory have devised a program that allows for Cyber Security defense systems to communicate when attacked and transmit that information to cyber systems at other institutions in the hopes of strengthening the overall cyber security posture of the complex.&#8216;The Federated Model for Cyber Security acts as a virtual neighborhood watch [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/dc/Human_Iris_JD052007.jpg/250px-Human_Iris_JD052007.jpg" title="iris" height="180"  />&#8220;Scientists at DOE&#8217;s Argonne National Laboratory have devised a program that allows for Cyber Security defense systems to communicate when attacked and transmit that information to cyber systems at other institutions in the hopes of strengthening the overall cyber security posture of the complex.<br/><br/>&#8216;The Federated Model for Cyber Security acts as a virtual neighborhood watch program. If one institution is attacked; secure and timely communication to others in the Federation will aide in protecting them from that same attack through active response,&#8217; cyber security officer Michael Skwarek said.&#8221;<br/><br/><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090716164344.htm" target="_blank">via sciencedaily.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/22/doe-security-has-developed-a-virtual-neighborhood-watch-to-protect-its-interests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Germany Readies Internet Censorship</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/22/germany-readies-internet-censorship/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/22/germany-readies-internet-censorship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Germany is on the verge of censoring its Internet: The government – a grand coalition between the German social democrats and conservative party – seems united in its decision: On Thursday the parliament is to vote on the erection of an internet censorship architecture.The Minister for Family Affairs Ursula von der Leyen kicked off and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://wikileaks.org/w/images/Zensursula-231x300.png" title="germany internet censorship Ursula von der Leyen" height="180" />&#8220;Germany is on the verge of censoring its Internet: The government – a grand coalition between the German social democrats and conservative party – seems united in its decision: On Thursday the parliament is to vote on the erection of an internet censorship architecture.<br/><br/>The Minister for Family Affairs Ursula von der Leyen kicked off and led the discussions within the German Federal Government to block Internet sites in order to fight child pornography. The general idea is to build a censorship architecture enabling the government to block content containing child pornography. The Federal Office of Criminal Investigation (BKA) is to administer the lists of sites to be blocked and the internet providers obliged to erect the secret censorship architecture for the government. &#8220;<br/><br/><a href="http://wikileaks.org/wiki/The_Dawning_of_Internet_Censorship_in_Germany" target="_blank">via wikileaks.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/22/germany-readies-internet-censorship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Brother&#8217;s DNA Testing has Gone Portable</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/22/big-brothers-dna-testing-has-gone-portable/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/22/big-brothers-dna-testing-has-gone-portable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Handheld DNA testing machines will revolutionise the investigation of murder, rape and other serious crime by producing results from the national database within an hour.&#8216;Rapid DNA&#8217; technology will enable detectives to test material at the scene of a crime or in a police station and eliminate the need to send it to a laboratory.A Whitehall [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c4/DNA_double_helix_horizontal.png" title="DNA double helix" class="alignnone" width="495" height="408" />&#8220;Handheld DNA testing machines will revolutionise the investigation of murder, rape and other serious crime by producing results from the national database within an hour.<br/><br/>&#8216;Rapid DNA&#8217; technology will enable detectives to test material at the scene of a crime or in a police station and eliminate the need to send it to a laboratory.<br/><br/>A Whitehall briefing paper discusses the use of portable equipment for DNA analysis in one hour rather than three or four days with the longer-term aim of reducing the testing time to 30 minutes. &#8220;<br/><br/><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article6723549.ece" target="_blank">via timesonline.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/22/big-brothers-dna-testing-has-gone-portable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Raytheon to become Obama&#8217;s Internet Watchdog</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/22/raytheon-to-become-obamas-internet-watchdog/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/22/raytheon-to-become-obamas-internet-watchdog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raytheon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watchdog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Defense and intelligence contractor Raytheon is moving into the lucrative realm of cyber warfare, and wants to hire hundreds of &#8216;cyber warriors&#8217; to &#8216;play offense and defense,&#8217; according to an advertisement on the company’s web site.&#8216;President Obama recently announced that cyber security is one of our country’s most urgent national security priorities,&#8217; reads the ad. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/threatlevel/2009/07/air-force-command-center1.jpg" title="air force command" class="alignnone" width="720" height="486" />&#8220;Defense and intelligence contractor Raytheon is moving into the lucrative realm of cyber warfare, and wants to hire hundreds of &#8216;cyber warriors&#8217; to &#8216;play offense and defense,&#8217; according to an advertisement on the company’s web site.<br/><br/>&#8216;President Obama recently announced that cyber security is one of our country’s most urgent national security priorities,&#8217; reads the ad. &#8216;Raytheon is answering that call by hiring more cyber warriors this year to help fight the digital cyber war.&#8217;<br/><br/>The ad says the company has 250 positions available in its Intelligence and Information Systems (IIS) division. The jobs are for, among others, reverse engineers, kernel developers, and vulnerability and intrusion detection engineers. Raytheon also has positions available for something called “media sanitation specialists.”&#8221;<br/><br/><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/07/raytheon/" target="_blank">via wired.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/22/raytheon-to-become-obamas-internet-watchdog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illegally Blatant British Big Brother Surveillance Continues</title>
		<link>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/21/illegally-blatant-british-big-brother-surveillance-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/21/illegally-blatant-british-big-brother-surveillance-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cctv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofluffnews.org/?p=246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Local authorities are still illegally spying on individuals despite curbs imposed on their covert activities, the senior official charged with scrutinising their activities said today.The disclosure appears in the latest annual report by Sir Christopher Rose, the chief surveillance commissioner. He said it was &#8216;of significant concern&#8217; that councils were conducting covert surveillance of individuals [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/06/OxfordCCTV2006.jpg/800px-OxfordCCTV2006.jpg" title="oxford cctv" />&#8220;Local authorities are still illegally spying on individuals despite curbs imposed on their covert activities, the senior official charged with scrutinising their activities said today.<br/><br/>The disclosure appears in the latest annual report by Sir Christopher Rose, the chief surveillance commissioner. He said it was &#8216;of significant concern&#8217; that councils were conducting covert surveillance of individuals for purposes now banned under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, Ripa.<br/><br/>Local councils were authorised to conduct nearly 5,000 &#8216;directed surveillance&#8217; missions in the year to the end of March, he revealed. Almost 5,000 were also carried out by other public authorities, including Whitehall departments.<br/><br/>&#8216;Directed surveillance&#8217; is defined as &#8216;covert surveillance of individuals while in a public place for the purposes of a specific investigation&#8217;. Such surveillance can be used only for the &#8216;protection or detection of crime or of preventing disorder&#8217;&#8230;&#8221;<br/><br/><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/jul/21/local-authorities-spy-on-public" target="_blank">via guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofluffnews.org/2009/07/21/illegally-blatant-british-big-brother-surveillance-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
